Explanation: Each team is listed with its record, overall score differential, and six ratings. Brief explanations of the ratings follow.
• Schedule The number in this column is the effective opponent strength of a team. In other words, they would be expected to have the same record had they played all games against an opponent of this predictive rating at a neutral site. Because this calculation depends on the strength of the team in question, it is not possible to rank schedules using these values.
• Standard Ranks teams in an order such that a team is "probably better" than all teams ranked lower than it. This calculation uses margin of victory only for computing a team's opponents strengths; the team's rating itself is computed using only wins, losses, and ties relative to its schedule
• Median Likelihood Determines the likely ratings for each team, based on its wins, losses, and ties relative to its schedule. This generally produces the same or similar ratings as the standard ranking.
• Predictive Both schedule strength and rating vs. schedule strength are determined considering both the wins and losses and the score differentials. This rating contains none of the biases in the standard rating, but does weight recent games slightly more than past games since those are a better indication of the team's current strength. This rating is the best of the first three for seeing how good teams are, and thus is the best for predicting future results.
• Improved RPI Rating The improved RPI formula is similar to the standard RPI, except that the schedule strength is carried out to infinite depth instead of ending with opponents' opponents, thus allows for a better comparison of isolated groups of teams than is given by the standard RPI calculation. It is similar to the simple rating, except that all games are given equal weight.
• RPI Rating. Included only because of common real-life usage. The RPI rating has many statistical problems. The football RPI rating is based on the BCS formula, and approximates the schedule, loss, and quality win components.
• Pseudo-Poll. A blended ranking based on win-loss and predictive ratings, calibrated to match real-life polls as closely as possible. This gives a rough but unbiased estimate of how typical voters value record vs. impressive wins.
• Predictive-Scoring. This value indicates how many points a team would be expected to score if it played an identical team.
• Predictive-Offense. This combines the predictive and scoring ratings to measure how many points a team scores. The number is the predictive rating of an opponent against whom the team would be expected to score the league average number of points. This does not necessarily rate a team's offensive abilities, as a fast pace in basketball or big-play defense in football can make a team score more points.
• Predictive-Defense. This combines the predictive and scoring ratings to measure how many points a team allows. The number is the predictive rating of an opponent against whom the team would be expected to allow the league average number of points. The same caveat in the predictive-offense rating applies here.
Because these ratings contain no prejudices regarding team or conference strengths, they tend to be quite inaccurate early in the seasons. College football appears to take at least 5 games per team before even remotely reasonable ratings are produced; acceptable ratings are produced with 8 games per team; excellent ratings unfortunately require 14 games per team.

Rankings by division: Overall NCAA-I NCAA-II NCAA-III NAIA-I NAIA-II NCCAA-I NCCAA-II USCAA-I USCAA-II CIS CCAA NBCAA Indep

Full Ranking

``````                                                    STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI     RPI         POLL       OFFENSE     DEFENSE
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
Douglas                 22  0  0 2095 1447 -1.822    1 -0.283    1 -0.361    1 -0.302    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    1 15.011    1  0.176    2 -0.780
Sheridan                25  5  0 2403 1977 -1.689    2 -0.816    2 -0.858    3 -1.028    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    2 12.701    2 -0.964    4 -1.092
Mt St-Vincent NS        28  2  0 2435 1717 -2.197    3 -0.903    3 -0.951    2 -1.021    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    3 12.564   11 -1.544    1 -0.497
Humber                  20  5  1 2023 1663 -1.639    4 -1.029    4 -1.059    4 -1.094    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    4 12.076    5 -1.348    3 -0.840
Fanshawe                17  7  0 1842 1574 -1.892    5 -1.455    5 -1.504    5 -1.493    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    5 10.412   15 -1.692    5 -1.294
Algoma                  15 10  0 1885 1780 -1.788    6 -1.542    6 -1.607    7 -1.629    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    6  9.962   10 -1.542    9 -1.715
Dawson                  15  7  0 1684 1486 -1.941    7 -1.594    7 -1.663    6 -1.493    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    7  9.865    9 -1.527    7 -1.459
Champlain St-Lambert    17 10  1 2118 1931 -1.944    8 -1.605    8 -1.675    9 -1.764    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    8  9.762   16 -1.744   10 -1.784
Fleming                 15  6  0 1740 1586 -2.398    9 -1.797    9 -1.885   14 -2.055    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   11  8.983    4 -1.291   29 -2.820
Centennial              15  6  0 1659 1518 -2.418   10 -1.823   10 -1.913   22 -2.357    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   12  8.854   20 -2.007   25 -2.707
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
St Lawrence ON          16  8  0 1870 1664 -2.257   11 -1.838   11 -1.931   10 -1.808    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   10  9.006   14 -1.681   12 -1.934
Mount Royal             20  4  0 1982 1536 -2.713   12 -1.847   12 -1.943    8 -1.664    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    9  9.178   13 -1.639    8 -1.688
Vanier                  14  7  0 1648 1518 -2.423   13 -1.883   14 -1.989   21 -2.321    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   16  8.608   19 -1.973   24 -2.669
Mohawk                  11  9  0 1607 1539 -2.074   14 -1.883   13 -1.988   15 -2.120    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   14  8.677    6 -1.376   31 -2.863
Lakeland AB             25  7  0 2759 2411 -2.756   15 -1.894   15 -2.005   20 -2.301    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   13  8.726    8 -1.467   34 -3.135
Col. Ed.-Montpetit      13  6  0 1451 1280 -2.434   16 -1.904   16 -2.018   17 -2.146    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   15  8.642   25 -2.208   13 -2.083
Okanagan                13  7  0 1611 1556 -2.438   17 -1.938   17 -2.060   18 -2.287    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   18  8.486   17 -1.817   28 -2.757
Col. Montmorency        12 11  0 1709 1617 -1.995   18 -1.970   18 -2.098   11 -1.880    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   17  8.504   18 -1.925   11 -1.835
Grant MacEwan           24  8  0 2545 2290 -2.832   19 -2.006   19 -2.143   25 -2.437    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   20  8.344   30 -2.279   20 -2.595
Niagara ON              10  9  0 1548 1425 -2.034   20 -2.008   20 -2.145   12 -1.939    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   19  8.398    3 -1.290   19 -2.588
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
Algonquin               16 13  0 2041 1877 -2.204   21 -2.037   21 -2.186   13 -2.001    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   21  8.301   32 -2.597    6 -1.406
Loyalist                12  9  0 1460 1442 -2.482   22 -2.114   22 -2.288   27 -2.548    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   22  7.883   42 -2.934   14 -2.163
Red Deer                16  7  0 1645 1548 -2.841   23 -2.144   23 -2.323   29 -2.601    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   23  7.854   43 -2.956   15 -2.246
Malaspina               10  6  0 1259 1177 -2.590   24 -2.180   24 -2.368   19 -2.288    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   24  7.819   27 -2.237   16 -2.338
Camosun                 12  7  0 1581 1480 -2.632   25 -2.210   25 -2.401   16 -2.133    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   25  7.698   12 -1.608   23 -2.659
U of King's Coll        17  6  0 1857 1654 -3.106   26 -2.240   26 -2.440   32 -2.692    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   26  7.598   29 -2.251   33 -3.134
Col. de Sainte-Foy       9 10  0 1421 1424 -2.429   27 -2.264   27 -2.471   30 -2.669    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   28  7.471   31 -2.372   32 -2.966
Lethbridge CC           14  9  0 1815 1751 -2.752   28 -2.272   28 -2.483   31 -2.672    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   27  7.493   21 -2.075   36 -3.269
Durham                  10 11  0 1592 1570 -2.467   29 -2.333   29 -2.565   23 -2.412    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   29  7.325   22 -2.088   27 -2.736
John Abbott              9 15  0 1881 2002 -2.284   30 -2.354   30 -2.590   26 -2.472    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   30  7.244    7 -1.464   43 -3.480
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
Seneca                  12 14  0 1855 1841 -2.525   31 -2.395   31 -2.643   28 -2.560    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   31  7.140   34 -2.732   17 -2.389
Concordia AB            16 13  0 2129 2064 -2.991   32 -2.540   32 -2.852   34 -2.820    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   32  6.710   41 -2.932   26 -2.708
Cambrian                 8 13  0 1564 1561 -2.534   33 -2.563   33 -2.878   24 -2.434    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   33  6.632   26 -2.222   22 -2.646
George Brown             8 12  0 1327 1414 -2.628   34 -2.581   34 -2.902   36 -2.880    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   35  6.315   47 -3.318   18 -2.442
St Clair                 7 15  0 1524 1633 -2.369   35 -2.608   35 -2.939   33 -2.721    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   34  6.320   35 -2.808   21 -2.633
Grande Prairie          13 13  0 1942 1964 -3.099   36 -2.678   37 -3.034   39 -3.069    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   36  6.083   37 -2.873   35 -3.265
Mount Allison           13 11  0 1828 1809 -3.198   37 -2.699   38 -3.060   38 -3.061    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   37  6.061   33 -2.644   42 -3.477
Atlantic Baptist        13  9  0 1644 1670 -3.437   38 -2.707   36 -3.027   49 -3.423    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   38  5.954   45 -3.098   50 -3.748
Columbia Bible           7 13  0 1619 1817 -2.793   39 -2.736   39 -3.070   43 -3.309    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   39  5.837   23 -2.158   56 -4.460
Lambton                  5 15  0 1394 1614 -2.491   40 -2.780   40 -3.131   40 -3.177    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   40  5.746   36 -2.827   45 -3.527
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
Capilano                 6 12  0 1462 1610 -2.884   41 -2.851   41 -3.240   44 -3.319    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   41  5.580   28 -2.246   55 -4.392
Georgian                 5 15  0 1528 1654 -2.651   42 -2.880   42 -3.279   37 -2.969    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   42  5.531   24 -2.182   51 -3.756
Medicine Hat             8 15  0 1589 1763 -3.019   43 -2.880   43 -3.281   48 -3.414    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   44  5.503   49 -3.450   38 -3.378
UNBC                     5 11  0 1166 1243 -2.799   44 -2.905   44 -3.313   35 -2.875    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   43  5.524   39 -2.905   30 -2.845
Ahuntsic                 3 13  0 1080 1306 -2.745   45 -2.989   45 -3.457   46 -3.402    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   47  5.136   46 -3.236   47 -3.567
Langara                  4 12  0 1118 1283 -2.891   46 -2.990   46 -3.460   45 -3.370    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   45  5.206   48 -3.439   37 -3.300
Briercrest               6 16  0 1590 1814 -2.958   47 -2.999   47 -3.472   47 -3.406    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   46  5.195   40 -2.908   52 -3.903
NAIT                     9 15  0 1787 1836 -3.239   48 -3.053   48 -3.565   42 -3.245    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   48  5.061   44 -3.023   40 -3.466
UNB-Saint John           9 17  0 1895 2005 -3.253   49 -3.147   49 -3.660   41 -3.217    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   49  4.884   38 -2.879   46 -3.555
Holland                  8 13  0 1492 1561 -3.439   50 -3.165   50 -3.662   51 -3.517    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   50  4.794   50 -3.517   44 -3.517
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
King's Univ Coll         7 17  0 1593 1851 -3.383   51 -3.229   51 -3.742   54 -3.939    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   52  4.525   55 -4.185   49 -3.692
SAIT                     4 16  0 1352 1547 -3.029   52 -3.244   52 -3.763   50 -3.506    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   51  4.643   52 -3.546   39 -3.466
Kwantlen                 3 14  0 1173 1419 -2.994   53 -3.248   53 -3.768   52 -3.599    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   53  4.491   51 -3.535   48 -3.663
Redeemer                 2 16  0  974 1428 -3.130   54 -3.393   54 -3.923   55 -4.240    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   55  4.073   59 -5.004   41 -3.476
St Thomas NB             6 16  0 1488 1709 -3.499   55 -3.426   55 -3.974   53 -3.934    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   54  4.165   54 -3.920   54 -3.949
La Cite                  1 21  0 1352 1975 -2.890   56 -3.501   56 -4.148   59 -4.855    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   56  3.663   57 -4.634   60 -5.075
Sault                    1 17  0 1090 1631 -3.181   57 -3.547   57 -4.258   58 -4.442    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   57  3.586   56 -4.233   57 -4.652
Limoilou                 0 17  0  958 1426 -2.885   58 -3.598   58 -4.404   57 -4.350    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   58  3.326   58 -4.778   53 -3.921
Augustana AB             1 23  0 1648 2080 -3.451   59 -3.723   59 -4.742   56 -4.310    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   59  3.010   53 -3.864   59 -4.757
Nova Scotia Ag Col       0 24  0 1370 2003 -3.608   60 -3.916   60 -5.153   60 -5.074    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   60  2.444   60 -5.449   58 -4.700

CCAA-ACAC: strength=-3.064 (#4)
STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI     RPI         POLL       OFFENSE     DEFENSE
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
Mount Royal             20  4  0 1982 1536 -2.713   12 -1.847   12 -1.943    8 -1.664    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    9  9.178   13 -1.639    8 -1.688
Lakeland AB             25  7  0 2759 2411 -2.756   15 -1.894   15 -2.005   20 -2.301    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   13  8.726    8 -1.467   34 -3.135
Grant MacEwan           24  8  0 2545 2290 -2.832   19 -2.006   19 -2.143   25 -2.437    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   20  8.344   30 -2.279   20 -2.595
Red Deer                16  7  0 1645 1548 -2.841   23 -2.144   23 -2.323   29 -2.601    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   23  7.854   43 -2.956   15 -2.246
Lethbridge CC           14  9  0 1815 1751 -2.752   28 -2.272   28 -2.483   31 -2.672    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   27  7.493   21 -2.075   36 -3.269
Concordia AB            16 13  0 2129 2064 -2.991   32 -2.540   32 -2.852   34 -2.820    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   32  6.710   41 -2.932   26 -2.708
Grande Prairie          13 13  0 1942 1964 -3.099   36 -2.678   37 -3.034   39 -3.069    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   36  6.083   37 -2.873   35 -3.265
Medicine Hat             8 15  0 1589 1763 -3.019   43 -2.880   43 -3.281   48 -3.414    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   44  5.503   49 -3.450   38 -3.378
Briercrest               6 16  0 1590 1814 -2.958   47 -2.999   47 -3.472   47 -3.406    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   46  5.195   40 -2.908   52 -3.903
NAIT                     9 15  0 1787 1836 -3.239   48 -3.053   48 -3.565   42 -3.245    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   48  5.061   44 -3.023   40 -3.466
King's Univ Coll         7 17  0 1593 1851 -3.383   51 -3.229   51 -3.742   54 -3.939    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   52  4.525   55 -4.185   49 -3.692
SAIT                     4 16  0 1352 1547 -3.029   52 -3.244   52 -3.763   50 -3.506    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   51  4.643   52 -3.546   39 -3.466
Augustana AB             1 23  0 1648 2080 -3.451   59 -3.723   59 -4.742   56 -4.310    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   59  3.010   53 -3.864   59 -4.757

CCAA-ACAA: strength=-3.367 (#5)
STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI     RPI         POLL       OFFENSE     DEFENSE
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
Mt St-Vincent NS        28  2  0 2435 1717 -2.197    3 -0.903    3 -0.951    2 -1.021    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    3 12.564   11 -1.544    1 -0.497
U of King's Coll        17  6  0 1857 1654 -3.106   26 -2.240   26 -2.440   32 -2.692    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   26  7.598   29 -2.251   33 -3.134
Mount Allison           13 11  0 1828 1809 -3.198   37 -2.699   38 -3.060   38 -3.061    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   37  6.061   33 -2.644   42 -3.477
Atlantic Baptist        13  9  0 1644 1670 -3.437   38 -2.707   36 -3.027   49 -3.423    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   38  5.954   45 -3.098   50 -3.748
UNB-Saint John           9 17  0 1895 2005 -3.253   49 -3.147   49 -3.660   41 -3.217    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   49  4.884   38 -2.879   46 -3.555
Holland                  8 13  0 1492 1561 -3.439   50 -3.165   50 -3.662   51 -3.517    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   50  4.794   50 -3.517   44 -3.517
St Thomas NB             6 16  0 1488 1709 -3.499   55 -3.426   55 -3.974   53 -3.934    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   54  4.165   54 -3.920   54 -3.949
Nova Scotia Ag Col       0 24  0 1370 2003 -3.608   60 -3.916   60 -5.153   60 -5.074    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   60  2.444   60 -5.449   58 -4.700

CCAA-BCCAA: strength=-2.757 (#3)
STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI     RPI         POLL       OFFENSE     DEFENSE
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
Douglas                 22  0  0 2095 1447 -1.822    1 -0.283    1 -0.361    1 -0.302    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    1 15.011    1  0.176    2 -0.780
Okanagan                13  7  0 1611 1556 -2.438   17 -1.938   17 -2.060   18 -2.287    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   18  8.486   17 -1.817   28 -2.757
Malaspina               10  6  0 1259 1177 -2.590   24 -2.180   24 -2.368   19 -2.288    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   24  7.819   27 -2.237   16 -2.338
Camosun                 12  7  0 1581 1480 -2.632   25 -2.210   25 -2.401   16 -2.133    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   25  7.698   12 -1.608   23 -2.659
Columbia Bible           7 13  0 1619 1817 -2.793   39 -2.736   39 -3.070   43 -3.309    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   39  5.837   23 -2.158   56 -4.460
Capilano                 6 12  0 1462 1610 -2.884   41 -2.851   41 -3.240   44 -3.319    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   41  5.580   28 -2.246   55 -4.392
UNBC                     5 11  0 1166 1243 -2.799   44 -2.905   44 -3.313   35 -2.875    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   43  5.524   39 -2.905   30 -2.845
Langara                  4 12  0 1118 1283 -2.891   46 -2.990   46 -3.460   45 -3.370    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   45  5.206   48 -3.439   37 -3.300
Kwantlen                 3 14  0 1173 1419 -2.994   53 -3.248   53 -3.768   52 -3.599    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   53  4.491   51 -3.535   48 -3.663

CCAA-FQSE: strength=-2.384 (#1)
STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI     RPI         POLL       OFFENSE     DEFENSE
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
Dawson                  15  7  0 1684 1486 -1.941    7 -1.594    7 -1.663    6 -1.493    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    7  9.865    9 -1.527    7 -1.459
Champlain St-Lambert    17 10  1 2118 1931 -1.944    8 -1.605    8 -1.675    9 -1.764    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    8  9.762   16 -1.744   10 -1.784
Vanier                  14  7  0 1648 1518 -2.423   13 -1.883   14 -1.989   21 -2.321    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   16  8.608   19 -1.973   24 -2.669
Col. Ed.-Montpetit      13  6  0 1451 1280 -2.434   16 -1.904   16 -2.018   17 -2.146    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   15  8.642   25 -2.208   13 -2.083
Col. Montmorency        12 11  0 1709 1617 -1.995   18 -1.970   18 -2.098   11 -1.880    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   17  8.504   18 -1.925   11 -1.835
Col. de Sainte-Foy       9 10  0 1421 1424 -2.429   27 -2.264   27 -2.471   30 -2.669    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   28  7.471   31 -2.372   32 -2.966
John Abbott              9 15  0 1881 2002 -2.284   30 -2.354   30 -2.590   26 -2.472    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   30  7.244    7 -1.464   43 -3.480
Ahuntsic                 3 13  0 1080 1306 -2.745   45 -2.989   45 -3.457   46 -3.402    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   47  5.136   46 -3.236   47 -3.567
Limoilou                 0 17  0  958 1426 -2.885   58 -3.598   58 -4.404   57 -4.350    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   58  3.326   58 -4.778   53 -3.921

CCAA-OCAA: strength=-2.385 (#2)
STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI     RPI         POLL       OFFENSE     DEFENSE
TEAM                     W  L  T   PF   PA  SCHED  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
Sheridan                25  5  0 2403 1977 -1.689    2 -0.816    2 -0.858    3 -1.028    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    2 12.701    2 -0.964    4 -1.092
Humber                  20  5  1 2023 1663 -1.639    4 -1.029    4 -1.059    4 -1.094    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    4 12.076    5 -1.348    3 -0.840
Fanshawe                17  7  0 1842 1574 -1.892    5 -1.455    5 -1.504    5 -1.493    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    5 10.412   15 -1.692    5 -1.294
Algoma                  15 10  0 1885 1780 -1.788    6 -1.542    6 -1.607    7 -1.629    1 0.0000    1 0.0000    6  9.962   10 -1.542    9 -1.715
Fleming                 15  6  0 1740 1586 -2.398    9 -1.797    9 -1.885   14 -2.055    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   11  8.983    4 -1.291   29 -2.820
Centennial              15  6  0 1659 1518 -2.418   10 -1.823   10 -1.913   22 -2.357    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   12  8.854   20 -2.007   25 -2.707
St Lawrence ON          16  8  0 1870 1664 -2.257   11 -1.838   11 -1.931   10 -1.808    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   10  9.006   14 -1.681   12 -1.934
Mohawk                  11  9  0 1607 1539 -2.074   14 -1.883   13 -1.988   15 -2.120    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   14  8.677    6 -1.376   31 -2.863
Niagara ON              10  9  0 1548 1425 -2.034   20 -2.008   20 -2.145   12 -1.939    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   19  8.398    3 -1.290   19 -2.588
Algonquin               16 13  0 2041 1877 -2.204   21 -2.037   21 -2.186   13 -2.001    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   21  8.301   32 -2.597    6 -1.406
Loyalist                12  9  0 1460 1442 -2.482   22 -2.114   22 -2.288   27 -2.548    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   22  7.883   42 -2.934   14 -2.163
Durham                  10 11  0 1592 1570 -2.467   29 -2.333   29 -2.565   23 -2.412    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   29  7.325   22 -2.088   27 -2.736
Seneca                  12 14  0 1855 1841 -2.525   31 -2.395   31 -2.643   28 -2.560    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   31  7.140   34 -2.732   17 -2.389
Cambrian                 8 13  0 1564 1561 -2.534   33 -2.563   33 -2.878   24 -2.434    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   33  6.632   26 -2.222   22 -2.646
George Brown             8 12  0 1327 1414 -2.628   34 -2.581   34 -2.902   36 -2.880    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   35  6.315   47 -3.318   18 -2.442
St Clair                 7 15  0 1524 1633 -2.369   35 -2.608   35 -2.939   33 -2.721    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   34  6.320   35 -2.808   21 -2.633
Lambton                  5 15  0 1394 1614 -2.491   40 -2.780   40 -3.131   40 -3.177    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   40  5.746   36 -2.827   45 -3.527
Georgian                 5 15  0 1528 1654 -2.651   42 -2.880   42 -3.279   37 -2.969    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   42  5.531   24 -2.182   51 -3.756
Redeemer                 2 16  0  974 1428 -3.130   54 -3.393   54 -3.923   55 -4.240    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   55  4.073   59 -5.004   41 -3.476
La Cite                  1 21  0 1352 1975 -2.890   56 -3.501   56 -4.148   59 -4.855    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   56  3.663   57 -4.634   60 -5.075
Sault                    1 17  0 1090 1631 -3.181   57 -3.547   57 -4.258   58 -4.442    1 0.0000    1 0.0000   57  3.586   56 -4.233   57 -4.652

Conference Strengths
CONFERENCE                   W   L   T   PCT  RNK RATING
CCAA-FQSE                   92  96   1 0.489    1 -2.384
CCAA-OCAA                  231 236   1 0.495    2 -2.385
CCAA-BCCAA                  82  82   0 0.500    3 -2.757
CCAA-ACAC                  163 163   0 0.500    4 -3.064
CCAA-ACAA                   94  98   0 0.490    5 -3.367
``````

``````Home field advantage amounts to:
0.295 points in main ratings
0.032 points in improved RPI
Average of 2.15 points per score
``````
```Predict score: vs. hosting at Team Strength vs. Time Plot: posted: Mon Dec 23 16:25:43 2019 ```

Back to Dolphin rankings main page.